Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Aleksey Balabanov's Zhmurki (Dead Man's Bluff) (2005)

Start-up capital and small business. An economics classroom and a business file. The Butcher. The Doctor. The Boar. Brain. The Cop. Comic books. Fast food. The sign of the cross three times. Vinyl records. The early-90s in Russia in the provinces.
Zhmurki (Dead Man's Bluff) is a film directed by Alexsey Balabanov and released in 2005. Sergei (Aleksei Panin) and Simon (Dmitriy Dyuzhev) work for Mikhajlovich (Nikita Mikhalkov), the local crime boss, and are effing up their first two jobs of the morning--one, collecting money from The Doctor; and two, delivering a case to a lawyer and picking up a case in return. Mikhajlovich, after their two eff-ups, gives the pair one more chance to perform a successful task for him--clean up the mess created by their two previous eff-ups. Time to visit The Cop.Balabanov's Dead Man's Bluff chooses as its setting recent history in Russia which, undoubtedly, speaks more to its culture. It is unknown as to whether Balabanov wants to transcend his culture with his story and his visual depiction of his story. Like a joke, the more familiar the listener is with the joke's set-up and details, then the potential for the punchline to be funnier is greatly increased. However, scenes like the initial one, set in 2005 in a university classroom where an economics lecture is given, give Dead Man's Bluff the feeling that perhaps the film is intended for a wider audience, like giving a set-up to a set-up to a joke for unfamiliar viewers. Despite any familiarity with the history of the setting or the setting and its culture, Balabanov's Dead Man's Bluff plays out like a playful joke, fluctuating in seriousness and disturbing, like giving a hearty laugh and then giving an uncomfortable sigh upon reflection at the joke's subject matter. Comedy is extremely difficult to craft but highly successful and entertaining when done well. More challenging is to infuse comedy with dark and disturbing material, and when that comedy is successful, the result is Dead Man's Bluff.Set in a world of small business whose business is crime, The Butcher stands over his bound captive with his syringe in hand and myriad dead corpses littered around his shop. Balabanov's composition (like most within Dead Man's Bluff, it is static and meticulously-framed) is far too disturbing to induce a chuckle alone, so he allows The Butcher to pontificate on his impressive attributes and abilities. It's unsurprising that he is so successful. Three hooded gunmen make a surprise entrance and contribute to the corpses. How about The Doctor? Balabanov's composition of The Doctor is far too ridiculous, looking like a mad scientist behind his Bunsen burner and beakers, to be taken seriously. Sergei and Simon try shaking him down for protection money, but The Doctor doesn't need to pay outsiders for protection: he has two hulking bodyguards on his payroll, and they make a fortuitous entrance into The Doctor's laboratory. Corpses and their blood end up spilling everywhere. The Boar has a driver in a slick Mercedes and has become successful in the Center. The Boar hands his business card to Sergei in front of the McDonald's restaurant where inside Simon purchases an extra-value meal for seventy-three thousand roubles.From its opening, Dead Man's Bluff presents the early days of the generation of start-up capital for future business entrepreneurs, where the overhead are corpses and the collateral is violence. Beyond the very cleverly rendered humor, like the business file that Sergei carries everywhere, Balabanov portrays his brutal violence in a business-like manner: the victims will cry for help and scream, but their executioners are without emotion, like workers suffering from the banality of routine. Balabanov embraces his executioners' (lack of) emotion and tone with his visual style. If his killers have no qualms with the amount of blood that they are shedding and corpses literally piling up, then neither does Balabanov. This seeming detachment from its director makes Dead Man's Bluff, like the game referenced in its English-language title, kind of dangerous. Often viewers, like joke listeners, want to be on the inside as to what is going on. Being on the outside of a joke or a movie, often the listener or viewer, respectively, feels as if the joke is on him/her or at his/her expense. With often static compositions and sombre colors, Balabanov frames his images like still-life paintings with its subject matter far from the familiar. The humor pulls the viewer in closer to the action while its disturbing matter attempts to push the viewer back out.Zhmurki (Dead Man's Bluff) is fun. Balabanov appears in his position to feel totally comfortable being under no obligation to tell his viewer how to feel. This is true court-jester cinema: being playful and creative, making the jokes at every one's expense, including his own, while his subject matter is undoubtedly important and relevant. All the performances are tops. Truly unique.

7 comments:

Alex B. said...

I had problems digesting this film.
It's not at all bad as a standalone curio.
But if seen in perspective, , it's clearly weaker than director's previous work. Some great actors, but they haven't adequate material to work with.
Some of the violence did go too far for a mere criminal comedy. Balabanov is known for tough, highly polituically incorrect, and often just plain racist films.
However, he's aloso a very strong director.
"Zhmurki" doesn't hold up very well against his early work. "Of freaks and men" remains his best.

Hans A. said...

Thank you Alex for sharing your thoughts. I'm often curious to hear what you have to say about a particular director or film. In general, I find almost all of Balabanov's work completely fascinating perhaps because I'm an outsider to the culture or because I can't think of anyone else quite like him. I'm inclined to agree that "Freaks" may be his best film. Your visits are always welcome and thanks again, Alex.

Alex B. said...

-It's a pleasure, I enjoy stopping by QUIET COOL:)
Regardless of moral issues one might potentially have with Balabanov's films, his films are never boring. He is one of the brightest stars of Russian cinema today.

P.S. If you're still interested in seeing KRAFTVERK 1374, you could have a copy for free from its' creators(if you'll take the time to review it afterwards). Let me know:)

Hans A. said...

Thanks so much, Alex.:) I purchased a legitimate DVD of KRAFTVERK 1374 and have it at home. I'm sure I will get around to viewing it soon and also posting a review. Thanks for the offer.

Alex B. said...

No worries, then :)

Anonymous said...

Hello Hans, thanks for this piece. unfortunately I only found it now. I wrote my PhD thesis on five of Balabanov's films, Dead Man's Bluff included. I'm glad you like this neo-noirish kind of humour too. In fact, the film also presents the first half of a gangster tragedy. It Doesn't Hurt gives the second and final part.
Hi Alex, Yes Bala's films are politically incorrect. Good that there are courageous and culturo-politically engaged artists. But they are not racist. When a character is a racist, it doesn't follow that the whole film let alone the director is.

Anonymous said...

My name is Florian, by the way. got it wrong with the buttons